Ed Stoffel

The Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned the U.S. that allowing Iran to go nuclear could have the worst consequences on the United States. With Russian assistance, a nuclear Iran now seems almost certain:

“If it built even a primitive nuclear weapon like the type that destroyed Hiroshima, Iran would not hesitate to load it on a ship, arm it with a detonator operated by GPS and sail it into a vital port on the east coast of North America,” Mr Barak told a conference of the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. Indicating the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran, Mr Barak said: “We are not taking any option off the table, and we recommend to the world not to take any option off the table, and we mean what we say.”

 

David Crist writes in today’s NY Times that Iran’s small boats are actually a big problem that we’ve known about for years.

In December, the Whidbey Island, a Navy dock-landing ship, fired warning shots at small Iranian craft that came too close. Three days later the frigate Carr was forced to use its ship’s horn to ward off three Iranian small boats, two of which were armed, according to Navy spokesmen. While these incidents may not seem alarming to those who’ve never served on a potentially vulnerable modern warship, they fit into a worrisome pattern, a two-decade-old military strategy by Iran intended to counter the United States presence in the Persian Gulf.

 Iran’s Small Boats Are a Big Problem, David Crist, NY Times